Below are five examples that a trader could in principle execute on Deribit.
Prices, fees and funding rates are illustrative; always check the live order book before acting.
1. Directional long with fixed-maturity BTC futures- Initial data: BTC-26JUN25 trades at 60 000 USD; maker fee = -0.01 %, taker fee = 0.05 %.
- Trader deposits 1 BTC as collateral (≈60 000 USD). Cross margin.
- Opens a 10-contract long (each contract = 1 USD of BTC value) with 10× leverage: notional 600 000 USD. Entry commission ≈600 000 × 0.0005 = 300 USD.
- Price rallies to 66 000 USD. Unrealised PnL = 600 000 × (66 000–60 000)/60 000 = 60 000 USD.
- Closes at market (another 300 USD fee). Net profit ≈59 400 USD, ROE ≈99 % on the original 60 000 USD of collateral. Liquidation level (cross) was roughly 54 600 USD, showing the tight risk window that comes with 10× leverage.
2. Cash-and-carry basis trade (delta-neutral)- Spot BTC = 60 000 USD. Same BTC-26JUN25 future trades at 63 000 USD (5 % premium, 90 days to expiry ≈ 20 % annualised).
- Trader buys 10 BTC spot (600 000 USD) on an external exchange, sends to Deribit.
- Simultaneously shorts 10 BTC worth of the June futures at 63 000 USD on Deribit. Fees ≈(600 000 + 630 000) × 0.0005 ≈ 615 USD.
- Holds until settlement. If at expiry spot equals 61 000 USD, the short future is marked there and the trader:
Gains (63 000 – 61 000) × 10 = 20 000 USD on the short futures.
Has a 1 000 USD mark-to-market loss on the spot (60 000→61 000).
Net before fees ≈19 000 USD; after fees ≈18 385 USD ≈ 3.1 % on capital tied up for three months (≈12.4 % annualised) with minimal market-direction risk.
3. Funding-rate capture on BTC perpetual vs. quarterly future• Deribit BTC-PERP currently pays +0.01 % funding every eight hours (≈10 % annualised). The quarterly future is at fair spot price.
• Trader sells 100 BTC of PERP and buys 100 BTC of BTC-26JUN25, locking a flat delta.
• Funding receipts: 100 BTC × 60 000 USD × 0.0001 = 600 USD every eight hours. Over 30 days that totals roughly 54 000 USD.
• Convergence drift between PERP and the quarterly contract is generally small; when deviation arises the trader can unwind for additional few-basis-point gains or roll the hedge as funding decays.
4. Calendar spread (term-structure trade)- Prices: BTC-30MAY25 = 61 200 USD; BTC-27SEP25 = 64 000 USD.
- Premium between contracts = 4.57 %. If historical average for that tenor gap is 6 %, a mean-reversion thesis suggests going long the near-dated and short the far-dated.
- Position size 50 BTC each leg:
– Long 50 BTC of MAY @ 61 200.
– Short 50 BTC of SEP @ 64 000.
If over the next month the spread widens to 6 % (say MAY 62 000, SEP 66 700), the trader books:
– +40 000 USD on the long (62 000–61 200) × 50.
– –135 000 USD on the short (66 700–64 000) × 50.
– Net +5 000 USD after two legs’ entry/exit fees (≈6 250 USD gross – 1 250 USD fees). The strategy’s delta remains near zero; profit stems purely from curvature of the term structure.
5. Protective short hedge against an existing ETH spot stack- Portfolio: long 5 000 ETH bought long ago at 800 USD. Current spot 3 000 USD (15 000 000 USD notional). Investor wishes to protect 50 % of downside for the next month.
- ETH-27JUN25 future at 3 020 USD. Short 2 500 ETH contracts.
- If ETH falls to 2 500 USD, the spot drawdown = 2 500 × 5 000 = –2 500 000 USD. The short future gains (3 020–2 500) × 2 500 = 1 300 000 USD, cutting the portfolio loss roughly in half (minus ≈7 550 USD total fees).
- If ETH rises to 3 500 USD instead, opportunity cost appears: spot gains 2 500 000 USD, but the short loses (3 500–3 020) × 2 500 = –1 200 000 USD, leaving a net gain of 1 300 000 USD—still positive but reduced relative to an unhedged position.
! All examples ignore funding-rate variation, slippage and liquidation thresholds, which must be modelled before committing real capital. Futures are inherently leveraged; small price movements can trigger margin calls. Use test-net, start small, and know the maintenance margin requirements published by Deribit.